Free Download
If you’re having tax problems

Doubt as to Collectibility Offers

Requirements for Doubt as to Collectibility Offers in Compromise

Before approving any Offer in Compromise (except DATL), the IRS must first calculate “Reasonable Collection Potential” (RCP), and determine if a “Doubt as to Collectibilty” exists.  If there is a Doubt-as-to-Collectibility, the IRS may accept the Offer in Compromise.  Otherwise, the DATC Offer will be rejected.

What does Doubt as to Collectibility Mean?

According to Section 5 of the Internal Revenue Manual, the Service “will accept,”  an OIC if “it is unlikely that the tax liability can be collected in full and the amount offered reasonably reflects collection potential.” This section provides a little more clarification by adding that an offer in compromise must be “a legitimate alternative to declaring a case currently not collectible or a protracted installment agreement [i.e. an installment agreement which extends beyond the collections Statute Of Limitations, which is usually ten years from the date the tax was due].”

In other words, if it is feasible for the taxpayer to pay the entire amount in either a lump sum (which for OIC purposes means no more than five installments) or via a payment plan that ends before the SOL expires, then there is no “Doubt as to Collectibility,” and the Offer in Compromise will be denied.

There is some leeway here thanks to the subjective word “unlikely” in IRM 5.8.1.2.3(1). The more the taxpayer owes in relation to the RCP (more on that in a minute), the more “unlikely” it is that the taxpayer can complete the repayment without creating a substantial financial hardship. An attorney’s job is to convince the Service that the point of no return comes up much more quickly than the raw numbers indicate, and in the post-Fresh Start environment, this concept is an easier sell now than it was five years ago.

How the IRS Calculates Reasonable Collection Potential

The IRS calculates RCP based on Form 656, which must accompany all OIC proposals. After analyzing the taxpayer’s finances, and these days, that’s usually an automated process, the Service determines RCP based on:

  • Assets: OIC calculations are usually based on an asset’s quick sale value, which is 80 percent of the Fair Market Value. Bear in mind that a home’s value on the tax appraisal website is usually not the FMV. This figure should probably come from a real estate appraiser who will look at comparables, market conditions, and so on.
  • Disposable Income: Similarly, there is often a difference between what the IRS considers optional and what expenses are really optional in the workaday world. 401(k) loan repayments spring immediately to mind.

The income calculation must cover either the next twelve months for a lump sum offer, or the next twenty-four months for an installment payment offer. If the taxpayer’s income is expected to change during that time period, perhaps due to pending unemployment or retirement, the IRS needs to know this information, because the aforementioned automated process will not account for such changes.

Ultimately, the numerical portion is all about the Reasonable Collection Potential. Before the IRS crunches the numbers, this figure needs to be as low as possible. That means carefully scrutinizing Form 656 and providing as many supporting documents, including letters, as possible.

There are some policy considerations embedded in the OIC as well, and in a future post, we’ll look at how taxpayers can leverage these considerations in their favor.

Venar Ayar, Esq.

Venar Ayar, Esq.

Attorney-at-Law, Master of Laws in Taxation
Principal and founder, Ayar Law

Venar is an award-winning tax attorney ranked as a Top Lawyer in the field of Tax Law. Mr. Ayar has a Master of Laws in Taxation – the highest degree available in tax, held by only a small number of the country’s attorneys.